Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Последние новости。业内人士推荐safew官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
Event’s first venture outside London aims to recognise geographical diversity of UK’s music talent，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
[4]《泰山石化被指濒临破产债权人要求启动清盘程序》经济观察网
Two people involved in the contamination were executed.